ISSN 2656-9531
MODALITY IN TEACHER-TO-TEACHER TALK OF ONLINE LEARNING: TENOR IN LANGUAGE USE
Abstract
Abstract
The objective of this study was to identify the reasons behind the realization of modality in teacher-to-teacher talk of online learning. The data of this study consisted of sentences that expressed modality, uttered by five primary school teachers as they discussed online learning. In addition, the teachers’ responses during interviews were also used to provide deeper insights into the reasons for their use of modality. The data were collected by using three main instruments, namely: observation sheet, interview sheet, and voice recorder. The data analysis followed the three stages of qualitative data analysis, namely: data condensation, data display, and drawing and verifying conclusions. The findings revealed that the use of modality in teacher-to-teacher talk of online learning was affected primarily by tenor. This includes the roles the teachers played during the interaction, which were shaped by elements such as power, contact, affect, and formality. Furthermore, modality was also realized due to the values that teachers attached to online learning. Most of the teachers expressed negative attitudes and preferences, indicating dissatisfaction or discomfort with the practice. Therefore, it is important for the government and policymakers to take teachers’ perceptions into account when designing and implementing educational policies, particularly those involving online learning in Indonesia.
Keywords: modality, teacher-to-teacher talk, online learning, tenor.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad, M., M. A. Mahmood, and A. Farukh. (2020). Use of Modals as Stance Markers: A Corpus-Based Study on Pakistani English Newspaper Editorials. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 30(1), 108-125. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1326365X20945424
Chen, W. (2016). The Discoursal Construction of the Lexicographer’s Identity in a Learner’s Dictionary: a Systemic Functional Perspective. International Journal of Lexicography, 30(3), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecw011
Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Espindola, E., and Y. Wang. (2016). The Enactment of Modality in Regulatory Texts: A Comparative Study of Tenancy Agreements. Journal of World Languages, 2(2-3), 106–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/21698252.2016.1186782
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A., and C. M. Matthiessen. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional. Oxon: Routledge.
Kosko, K. W., and P. Herbst (2012). A Deeper Look at How Teachers Say What They Say: A Quantitative Modality Analysis of Teacher-to-Teacher Talk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 589-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.11.010
Little, S. G., and A.A Little. (2008). Psychology’s Contributions to Classroom Management. Psychology in the Schools, 45(3), 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20293
Popping, R., and C.W. Roberts. (2009). Coding Issues in Modality Analysis. Field Methods, 21(3), 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1525822X09333433
Singh, V., and A. Thurman. (2019). How Many Ways Can We Define Online Learning? A Systematic Literature Review of Definitions of Online Learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35529/jllte.v7i1.84-94
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Citra Indah Maharani Laoli

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












