ISSN 2656-9531
A DESCRIPTIVE COMPARISON OF LANGUAGE POLICIES USING COBARRUBIAS’ LANGUAGE IDEOLOGIES: THE CASE OF SINGAPORE AND TIMOR-LESTE
Abstract
Language policy is mediated by the socio-politico-historical background of the society. It directs people to integrate and unify themselves to the vision of the governments towards progress, which includes education per se. This study compared Singapore and Timor-Leste, with quite similar backgrounds yet different implementation of policies as a result of each nation’s linguistic ideologies. A qualitative comparative design was employed in this study, using Cobarrubias’ Language Ideologies as a framework for comparison. Secondary materials are resourced as data. It is revealed the ideological concepts in the studied nations. In linguistic assimilation, Singapore did not employ the assimilation except for certain provisions in the government, and Timor-Leste had to assimilate minor languages due to the stronghold of dominant languages. For vernacularization, Singapore is accommodative to all linguistic groups, and Timor-Leste is fragmented to its bilingual approach. For linguistic pluralism, Singapore justifies an equitable response to the multilingual condition because of fewer languages, and all of these are dominant languages. Meanwhile, Timor-Leste is balancing the languages by strengthening the official languages and preserving the minor languages. In internationalization, both countries recognize the importance of foreign language in their constitution to advance internationalization and incorporate development through glocalization. It appears that Singapore has more of an advantage in comparison, probably due to discovering a suitable language policy that addresses the needs of the nation. On the other hand, Timor-Leste as a young nation is critically strategizing the best policy it could have. Perhaps, one nation can learn from another’s struggles as a benchmark. Certainly, no framework could be utilized in making perfect language policy because it is formed based on the nation’s social, political, and historical background.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, T. (2015). Language policy and planning in Timor-Leste: Challenges of a multilingual nation. Language Problems and Language Planning, 39(2), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.39.2.01and
Ao, G. (2024). Critical analysis of the application about multilingualism in education contexts with the case of Singapore. International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/38/20240173
Boon, D., Savio, E., Kroon, S., and Kurvers, J. (2021). Adult literacy classes in Timor-Leste and diverse language values and practices across the regions: Implications for language policy-making. Language Policy, 20, 99-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-020-09561-1
Burns, R. (2017). Education in Timor-Leste: Envisioning the future. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 6(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.14425/JICE.2017.6.1.3345
Cabral, E. and Martin-Jones, M. (2021). Critical ethnography of language policy in the global south: Insights from research in Timor-Leste. Language Policy, 20, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-020-09570-0
Cabral, I. (2021). From discourses about language-in-education policy to language practices in the classroom— a linguistic ethnographic study of a multi-scalar nature in Timor-Leste. Language Policy, 20, 26-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-020-09563-z
Cobarrubias J (1983) Ethical issues in status planning. In: Cobarrubias, Juan & Fishman, Joshua A. (eds.), Progress in language planning: International perspectives. Berlin: Mouton.
Constitution of the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste. (2002). Section 13: Official Languages. Dili: Government of Timor-Leste. https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/East_Timor_2002.pdf
Forlot, G. (2025). When the local confronts the global in language-in-education policies: The case of Singapore. Moussons, 45(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.4000/147jt
Gusmao. K. and Caet, A. (n.d.). Language in education policy in Timor-Leste Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales. (n.d.). Languages and social cohesion in Singapore: From independence to COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.inalco.fr/en/languages-and-social-cohesion-singapore-independence-covid-19
Johnson, D.C. (2013). What is language policy?. In: Language Policy. Research and Practice in Applied Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316202_1
Khalil, E. and Çavuşoğlu, Ç. (2025). Shifting language policies from multilingualism to bilingualism in Singapore: A literature review. Croatian Journal of Education, 27(1), 287-332. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v27i1.5990
Koh, P. and O’Brien, B. (2021). Early language education in Singapore. In M. Schwartz (ed.), Handbook of Early Language Education, Springer International Handbooks of Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47073-9_32-1
Leach, M. (2017). Nation-building and national identity in Timor-Leste. Routledge.
Lee, M. (2024). A history of national language policies in Singapore. Retrieved on 26th October 2025 from https://oxfordpoliticalreview.com/2024/08/28/a-history-of-national-language-policies-in-singapore/
Macpherson, R. (2011). Educational administration and management in Timor Leste: Language and capacity building challenges in a post-conflict context. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(2), 186-203. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541111107597
Marsal, A. and Sukardi (2021). Ration legis on the right to language in the education system in Timor-Leste. Yuridika, 36(3), 527-544. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v36i3.27245
Ministry of Education. (2010). Mother-tongue based multilingual education for Timor-Leste national policy
National University of Singapore. (n.d.). A critical examination of language planning policies in Singapore from 1950 to date. ScholarBank@NUS. Retrieved from https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/153145
Shu, H. (2025). Inspiration from Singapore bilingual education. International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/80/2024.20407
Siemund, P. and Li, L. (2020). Multilingualism and language policy in Singapore. In Henning Klöter and Mårten Söderblom Saarela (eds.) Language Diversity in the Sinophone World. London: Routledge.
Sundararaj, T. (2025). Singapore’s Bilingual Policy and Tamil Education: An Introduction. Shanlax International Journal of Tamil Research, 9(3), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.34293/tamil.v9i3.8602
Tan, C. (2005). Change and continuity: Chinese language policy in Singapore. Language Policy, 1, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-005-5625-7
Tanaka, K. (1987). Language policy in Singapore. International Relations, 84, 95–117. Retrieved from https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/kokusaiseiji1957/1987/84/1987_84_95/_article
Tans, F., Medah, K., Jama, K., Tualaka, D. and Balukh, J. (2023). Policy analysis and implementation of language learning in Timor-Leste. Res Militares, 13(1), 2525-2533.
Taylor-Leech, K. (2008). Language and identity in East Timor: The discourses of nation building. Language Problems and Language Planning, 32(2), 153–180. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.32.2.03tay
Williams-van Klinken, C. (2019). The development of Tetun as an official language in Timor-Leste. Current Issues in Language Planning, 20(5), 517–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2019.1585151
Wu, F. and Zhang, X. (2023). The impact of language policy on national identity in Timor-Leste from an incrementalism perspective. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 15, 68-76.
Zheng, X., & Luo, N. (2025). A Multidimensional Perspective on Language Planning and Policy in Singapore: Theory, Practice and Challenges. Journal of Current Social Issues Studies, 2(5), 322–326. https://doi.org/10.71113/JCSIS.v2i5.296
Zeng, J., Li, X. (2023). Ideologies underlying language policy and planning in the Philippines. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10, 405. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01911-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35529/jllte.v7i3.269-284
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Alican Mendez Pandapatan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.