ANALYSING THE ALIGNMENT OF LOTS AND HOTS IN SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE MERDEKA CURRICULUM

Simforianus Mario Bajo

Abstract


This study examines the alignment of Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) and Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in summative assessments within the context of the Merdeka curriculum at SMP Amore Prime School. The research utilizes a descriptive quantitative approach, analyzing English assessment items for grade 8 students in the 2024-2025 academic year. Data was collected from 51 summative test items, categorized according to Bloom’s revised taxonomy, with a focus on the distribution of LOTS and HOTS. The findings reveal a dominance of LOTS-based items (70.6%) over HOTS-based items (29.4%), indicating a gap in the ideal implementation of the Merdeka curriculum, which emphasizes critical thinking, creativity, and independent learning. Although the assessment items reflect an attempt to integrate both cognitive levels, the imbalance suggests that traditional rote-learning practices still prevail, particularly in assessing foundational knowledge. This study highlights the need for greater emphasis on HOTS in language assessments to fully align with the goals of the Merdeka curriculum and support the development of students' critical thinking and problem-solving skills.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.

Aziz, Z. A., Aulia, M., & Rianti, R. (2024). Incorporating Higher Order Thinking Skills into English Summative Assessments. English Review: Journal of English Education, 6(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i1.9301

Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2019). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices (3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Faradella, N. E. (2022). Students' Higher-Order Thinking Skills: Constructing Best Practices in Teaching English during Online Learning. Erudita: Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.28918/erudita.v2i1.5350

Irwan, I., Arnadi, A., & Aslan, A. (2024). Developing Critical Thinking Skills of Primary School Students through Independent Curriculum Learning. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE). Retrieved from https://injoe.org/index.php/INJOE/article/view/138

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Rampean, B. A. O., Rohaeti, E., & Utami, W. P. (2022). Teacher Difficulties for Developing Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment Instrument on Reaction Rate. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 6(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v6i1

Rea-Dickins, P., & Gardner, S. (2000). Snares and Silver Bullets: Disentangling the Construct of Formative Assessment. Language Testing, 17(2), 215–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220001700206

Waliyuddin, D. S., & Sulisworo, D. (2022). High Order Thinking Skills and Digital Literacy Skills Instrument Test. Jurnal Karya Ilmiah, 2022. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v7i1.310

Widiastuti, M. K., & Mbato, C. L. (2025). LOTS and HOTS Reading Questions in EFL Textbooks (Kurikulum Merdeka): Unveiling Every Learning Process Purpose. Journal of Applied Linguistics (JOALL). https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v10i1.37765




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35529/jllte.v7i1.37-46

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Simforianus Mario Bajo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.